Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
I am using this email address for both sending and receiving certain emails without technical problems. Best, Meeku ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders From: "Guillaume Brunerie" <guillaume.brunerie@gmail.com> Date: Thu, January 20, 2011 3:45 pm To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux" <arch-general@archlinux.org> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2011/1/20 Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org>
On Thursday 20 January 2011 14:15:32 Cédric Girard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Jesse Young <jesse.young@gmail.com> wrote:
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama
_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Do you really believe this is a serious request ?
Heh - but that is one cool email address.
The funny thing is that this is not even a valid email address. The local part (everything before the @) should be at most 64 characters long, and there itâs 84 characters long.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:10 PM, < hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com
wrote:
I am using this email address for both sending and receiving certain emails without technical problems.
Best,
Meeku
---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders From: "Guillaume Brunerie" <guillaume.brunerie@gmail.com> Date: Thu, January 20, 2011 3:45 pm To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux" <arch-general@archlinux.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011/1/20 Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org>
On Thursday 20 January 2011 14:15:32 Cédric Girard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Jesse Young <jesse.young@gmail.com> wrote:
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama
_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Do you really believe this is a serious request ?
Heh - but that is one cool email address.
The funny thing is that this is not even a valid email address. The local part (everything before the @) should be at most 64 characters long, and there it’s 84 characters long.
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ? -- Cédric Girard
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
On Sat 22 Jan 2011 06:23 -0500, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Well I refrained from saying anything until now. I'll be honest. I found your original mail to be a bit obnoxious and a bit spammish. I have nothing against your race or religion, but I think your email address is ridiculous. If you want to spread your message, at least put it in an email signature for God/Allah/Yaweh/Buddha/Guanyin/Vishnu's sake. Also the Arch mailing lists are not a place for religious preaching or discussion. Thanks for participating. Namaste.
On 22-01-2011 13:05, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 22 Jan 2011 06:23 -0500, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Well I refrained from saying anything until now. I'll be honest. I found your original mail to be a bit obnoxious and a bit spammish.
I have nothing against your race or religion, but I think your email address is ridiculous. If you want to spread your message, at least put it in an email signature for God/Allah/Yaweh/Buddha/Guanyin/Vishnu's sake. Also the Arch mailing lists are not a place for religious preaching or discussion. Thanks for participating.
Namaste.
I have to agree that I also found that the original post might be spam. The list has been spammed before, not with announcing the availability of another font but with something similar. Both the email address and the "press release" looked fishy. However, I also gave the original post the benefit of the doubt since it seems to be something that may benefit a community of people (personally I have no idea what the OP was on about). -- Mauro Santos
However, I also gave the original post the benefit of the doubt since it seems to be something that may benefit a community of people .....
Meeku: I am grateful for these words.
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Up to this point this thread has been ignore-able, but what sort of nonsense is this? Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such? What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this list in thinking that.
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Up to this point this thread has been ignore-able, but what sort of nonsense is this? Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such?
What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this list in thinking that.
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
2011/1/22 Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net>
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Up to this point this thread has been ignore-able, but what sort of nonsense is this? Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such?
What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this list in thinking that.
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
Isn't that a little bit trollist? We have to be tolerant of other cultures, if we oppress trollish people they will organise and rise up against us. See this interesting documentary for what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGlSAtb-SDw -- Geoff
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 01:28:50 pm Geoffrey Teale wrote:
2011/1/22 Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net>
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama _hare_hare@lavabit.com
wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Up to this point this thread has been ignore-able, but what sort of nonsense is this? Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such?
What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this list in thinking that.
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
Isn't that a little bit trollist? We have to be tolerant of other cultures, if we oppress trollish people they will organise and rise up against us. See this interesting documentary for what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGlSAtb-SDw
I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person?
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 13:58 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 01:28:50 pm Geoffrey Teale wrote:
2011/1/22 Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net>
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama _hare_hare@lavabit.com
wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
Up to this point this thread has been ignore-able, but what sort of nonsense is this? Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such?
What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam. I'm pretty sure I'm not alone on this list in thinking that.
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
Isn't that a little bit trollist? We have to be tolerant of other cultures, if we oppress trollish people they will organise and rise up against us. See this interesting documentary for what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGlSAtb-SDw
I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person?
Are trolls a race? Speciesist?
I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person?
Meeku: If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:03:25 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person?
Meeku: If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam.
You're not seriously suggesting it's religious persecution? Now I KNOW you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
.....you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:13:19 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
.....you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
I don't want to use your font, but I don't want you wasting space on my inbox or on the mailing list with your spam. Stop now.
On 23/01/11 18:13, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
.....you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
just so you know, your silly overly long email address alone qualifies you for spamming and the first mail sent by your was immediately flagged as such. It also doesn't help that your messages appear somewhat like it was written by a spammer and the you proceed to argue about it as-if your original mail was relevant to this ML.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:20:17 pm Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 23/01/11 18:13, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_h are_hare@lavabit.com
wrote:
.....you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
just so you know, your silly overly long email address alone qualifies you for spamming and the first mail sent by your was immediately flagged as such. It also doesn't help that your messages appear somewhat like it was written by a spammer and the you proceed to argue about it as-if your original mail was relevant to this ML.
I googled his e-mail. Seems he spammed the debian-user list, too.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net> wrote:
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:20:17 pm Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 23/01/11 18:13, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_h are_hare@lavabit.com
wrote:
.....you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If you don't want to use the font fine.
just so you know, your silly overly long email address alone qualifies you for spamming and the first mail sent by your was immediately flagged as such. It also doesn't help that your messages appear somewhat like it was written by a spammer and the you proceed to argue about it as-if your original mail was relevant to this ML.
I googled his e-mail. Seems he spammed the debian-user list, too.
At least he is courteous enough not to top post.
trollish .....
Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word.
Can somebody ban him? -- Kirill Churin Jabber: reflexing@reflexing.ru, ICQ: 8163230, Skype on demand.
Can somebody ban him?
Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding and operating systems are related. If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam. I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:05:15 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can somebody ban him?
Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding and operating systems are related. If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam.
It's spam because your promoting your font on a mailing list where such a thing is not just rude, but very unwelcome.
I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
Stop repeating your nonsense over and over, that, too, is spam.
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word. I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:00:55 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse than spammers.
Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word.
I don't want you advertising your crap on this mailing list either. He's not alone, and likely I'm not, either. Post something actually relevant to Arch Linux or leave it out.
I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
Programmers write code fine without your font, we don't need you trying to spam us with it. If you want people to try your font, put it on the AUR, stop spamming the mailing list.
.....stop spamming the mailing list.
Meeku: I respond to silly accusations and now I get hounded also.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:08:59 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
.....stop spamming the mailing list.
Meeku: I respond to silly accusations and now I get hounded also.
It's not a silly accusation when you're doing exactly what you're accused off. You're spamming the mailing list trying to get people to use your font. If by "hounding" you mean "not letting you get away with spam" then yes, that's what we're doing.
.....trying to get people to use your font.....spam.....we're.....
Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:15:59 pm hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
.....trying to get people to use your font.....spam.....we're.....
Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
I don't want you spamming your idiot font on the mailing list, either. My issue isn't not wanting to use your font, its you wasting our time and mailing list with it.
Been lurking here for a while and I'm now really considering dropping this list. Please do not feed the troll it will only make it worse. Cani Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -----Original Message----- From: hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com Sender: arch-general-bounces@archlinux.orgDate: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:15:59 To: General Discussion about Arch Linux<arch-general@archlinux.org> Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@archlinux.org> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
.....trying to get people to use your font.....spam.....we're.....
Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:17:54 pm oli@deathbycomputers.co.uk wrote:
Been lurking here for a while and I'm now really considering dropping this list. Please do not feed the troll it will only make it worse.
Cani Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-----Original Message----- From: hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_ hare_hare@lavabit.com Sender: arch-general-bounces@archlinux.orgDate: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:15:59 To: General Discussion about Arch Linux<arch-general@archlinux.org> Reply-To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general@archlinux.org> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Rail Model font for coders
.....trying to get people to use your font.....spam.....we're.....
Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
I'll stop. Added the troll to my KMail filter. Anything he sends goes straight to my trash.
.....Accusations of racism simply because your spam is being identified as such?
Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word.
What 'spam' is is decided by the recipients. I personally think this whole thread is spam.....
Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding and operating systems are related. If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email addresses on a public mailing list rather than contents or the on-topic contents are ignored, then it is not spam. I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 05:23:13 am hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com wrote:
Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word "my" and if you are a closet racist by condemning me from participating on this open mailing list then it does not do Arch Linux's reputation any good.
How does pointing you out to be a spammer make him a racist all of a sudden? I smell troll.
How does pointing you out to be a spammer make him a racist all of a sudden?
Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to participate on this mailing list tactically made his personal opinion to be representative for others also by using the 'our' word.
I smell troll.
Meeku: I also want to research the correlation between your opinion-judgement in this case and the lines of evidenced based productive Arch Linux coding you have written first hand and I would be grateful for this statistic and evidence.
participants (11)
-
Cédric Girard
-
Geoffrey Teale
-
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare＠lavabit.com
-
Kirill Churin
-
Loui Chang
-
Mauro Santos
-
Nathan Wayde
-
Ng Oon-Ee
-
oli＠deathbycomputers.co.uk
-
Thomas Dziedzic
-
Yaro Kasear