[arch-general] scons "update"
# pacman -Syu ... warning: scons: local (1.1.0.d20081104-1) is newer than extra (1.1.0-1) ... Is there a reason for reverting to the stable scons release or the packager intended to update to latest 1.1.0.d20081207? bye
2008/12/19, Alessandro Doro <ordo.ad@gmail.com>:
Is there a reason for reverting to the stable scons release or the packager intended to update to latest 1.1.0.d20081207?
pacman -Sy scons and accept to install it anyway. -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:08:05AM -0800, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2008/12/19, Alessandro Doro <ordo.ad@gmail.com>:
Is there a reason for reverting to the stable scons release or the packager intended to update to latest 1.1.0.d20081207?
pacman -Sy scons and accept to install it anyway.
No problem with that. Just wondering about scons update path: october 6: 1.0.1-1 october 22: 1.1.0-2 november 22: 1.1.0.d20081104-1 december 7: 1.1.0.d20081207 available upstream december 18: 1.1.0-1 regards
scons 1.1.0-1 was broken for me, so i filed a report on it. Still haven't heard anything. As far as I can tell, it has issues with python. In reality, this should have been fixed along with the python upgrade. -J On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 17:06 +0100, Alessandro Doro wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:08:05AM -0800, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2008/12/19, Alessandro Doro <ordo.ad@gmail.com>:
Is there a reason for reverting to the stable scons release or the packager intended to update to latest 1.1.0.d20081207?
pacman -Sy scons and accept to install it anyway.
No problem with that. Just wondering about scons update path:
october 6: 1.0.1-1 october 22: 1.1.0-2 november 22: 1.1.0.d20081104-1 december 7: 1.1.0.d20081207 available upstream december 18: 1.1.0-1
regards
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:48:22PM +0000, Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
scons 1.1.0-1 was broken for me, so i filed a report on it. Still haven't heard anything. As far as I can tell, it has issues with python. In reality, this should have been fixed along with the python upgrade.
About FS#12076. I regularly use scons to build blender without issues. Well, now that we have reverted to 1.1.0 I only see two deprecation warnings. I don't know if there are other problems. Anyway 1.2.0 is to be released soon. $ scons scons: Reading SConscript files ... /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SCons/Platform/posix.py:38: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. import popen2 /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SCons/Tool/msvs.py:37: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead bye
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:06:04PM +0100, Alessandro Doro wrote:
Just wondering about scons update path:
Log message in svn revision 21995 is a rather clear answer. But keeps open FS#12076. bye
participants (3)
-
Alessandro Doro
-
Giovanni Scafora
-
Jon Kristian Nilsen