[arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached
Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patches are required anymore. I'm currently running this package and see no trouble. Please use this to update boost in [extra] :). -- Sven-Hendrik # $Id: PKGBUILD 47703 2009-07-25 14:37:19Z giovanni $ # Maintainer: kevin <kevin@archlinux.org> # TU: Kritoke <kritoke@gamebox.net> # Contributor: Luca Roccia <little_rock@users.sourceforge.net> # Contributor: Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> pkgname=boost pkgver=1.41.0 _boostver=${pkgver//./_} pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries." arch=(i686 x86_64) url="http://www.boost.org/" depends=('python>=2.5' 'bzip2' 'zlib') source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/${pkgname}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}.tar.bz2) license=('custom') options=(!ccache) md5sums=('8bb65e133907db727a2a825c5400d0a6') build() { cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver} #export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fno-strict-aliasing" #export CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -fno-strict-aliasing" # build bjam cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}/tools/jam/src ./build.sh cc || return 1 _bindir="bin.linuxx86" [ "${CARCH}" = "x86_64" ] && _bindir="bin.linuxx86_64" install -m755 -d ${pkgdir}/usr/bin install -m755 ${_bindir}/bjam ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/bjam || return 1 # build bcp cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}/tools/bcp ../jam/src/${_bindir}/bjam || return 1 install -m755 ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}/dist/bin/bcp \ ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/bcp || return 1 # build libs cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver} # default "minimal" install: "release link=shared,static # runtime-link=shared threading=multi" # --layout=tagged will add the "-mt" suffix for multithreaded libraries # and installs includes in /usr/include/boost. # --layout=system no longer adds the -mt suffix for multi-threaded libs. ./tools/jam/src/${_bindir}/bjam \ release debug-symbols=off threading=single,multi \ runtime-link=shared link=shared,static \ cflags=-fno-strict-aliasing \ --prefix=${pkgdir}/usr \ -sPYTHON_ROOT=/usr \ -sPYTHON_VERSION=2.6 \ -sTOOLS=gcc \ --layout=tagged \ install || return 1 # --with-wave install || return 1 # -d2 <- debug cflags=-fno-strict-aliasing \ # build pyste cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}/libs/python/pyste/install python setup.py install --root=${pkgdir} || return 1 # license install -m755 -d ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname} install -m644 ${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${_boostver}/LICENSE_1_0.txt \ ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/ || return 1 }
On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patches are required anymore. I'm currently running this package and see no trouble. Please use this to update boost in [extra] :).
-- Sven-Hendrik
if it where that simple :). boost update require a lot of packages to be rebuild. we have a rebuild in progress in testing and maybe after that we are bumping that too. -- Ionut
On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patches are required anymore. I'm currently running this package and see no trouble. Please use this to update boost in [extra] :).
-- Sven-Hendrik
if it where that simple :). boost update require a lot of packages to be rebuild. we have a rebuild in progress in testing and maybe after that we are bumping that too.
It's only 29 packages though and boost usually changes with backwards compatibility in mind. Am I being naive? :)
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patches are required anymore. I'm currently running this package and see no trouble. Please use this to update boost in [extra] :).
-- Sven-Hendrik
if it where that simple :). boost update require a lot of packages to be rebuild. we have a rebuild in progress in testing and maybe after that we are bumping that too.
It's only 29 packages though and boost usually changes with backwards compatibility in mind. Am I being naive? :)
If the soname changes, then everything needs to be rebuilt. We try to keep one large rebuild in testing at a time. Currently we have rebuilds for heimdal in there.
2009/11/25, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
If the soname changes, then everything needs to be rebuilt. We try to keep one large rebuild in testing at a time. Currently we have rebuilds for heimdal in there.
I just checked it out. The soname changes, then everything needs to be rebuilt. We can do that, but after the actual rebuilds in testing. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it
I was waiting for 1.41 to come out since I knew it would be soon. I didn't want to rebuild everything for 1.40 only to have the new version released the next day. k On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:12 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patches are required anymore. I'm currently running this package and see no trouble. Please use this to update boost in [extra] :).
-- Sven-Hendrik
if it where that simple :). boost update require a lot of packages to be rebuild. we have a rebuild in progress in testing and maybe after that we are bumping that too.
It's only 29 packages though and boost usually changes with backwards compatibility in mind. Am I being naive? :)
-- K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Giovanni Scafora
-
Ionut Biru
-
K. Piche
-
Sven-Hendrik Haase