[arch-general] extra/hibernate-script out of date -> new version
Hi everyone, As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please? Thanks Guillaume ALAUX [1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95899 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/hibernate-script/ [3] http://archlinux.alaux.net/hibernate-script-2.0-2.src.tar.gz
Hi everyone,
As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please?
At this time it might be better to use the -git version There's a small number of fairly important changes (and 2.0 has been released more that a year ago) -- damjan
Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
Hi everyone,
As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please?
Thanks
Guillaume ALAUX
[1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95899 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/hibernate-script/ [3] http://archlinux.alaux.net/hibernate-script-2.0-2.src.tar.gz
I used to maintain this, but neither have the time nor the possibility to test it right now. I orphaned it and requested another Dev or TU to take it. Nobody ever responded, which means you can put the package in the AUR and I'll delete it from the repository.
OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99? On 10 May 2010 15:50, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Am 10.05.2010 15:13, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
Hi everyone,
As stated by "mrbrich" in this thread [1], package extra/hibernate-script [2] is out of date (old version 1.99 ; new version should be 2.0). I made this new one [3] that installs fine but I can't test it. Could anyone using it give it a try please?
Thanks
Guillaume ALAUX
[1] http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=95899 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/hibernate-script/ [3] http://archlinux.alaux.net/hibernate-script-2.0-2.src.tar.gz
I used to maintain this, but neither have the time nor the possibility to test it right now. I orphaned it and requested another Dev or TU to take it. Nobody ever responded, which means you can put the package in the AUR and I'll delete it from the repository.
Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99?
In the past I always used the stable version. However, I never used it together with tuxonice, but only with usual suspend to RAM, so I don't know how good the tuxonice support is in the stable release. As I said, I haven't actually been maintaining this recently.
Hi Thomas, Here is the package I have just uploaded in AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37110 You can delete it from extra then. I checked others PKGBUILD and none of them make any reference to it so we should'nt have issues with dependencies. I will add some explanation on the AUR page to explain that this pkg requires testing and feedback. I will also get the wiki page up to date to reflect this repo change if you confirm you deleted it. Thanks. Guillaume ALAUX On 10 May 2010 16:01, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Guillaume ALAUX:
OK So Thomas as you were the maintainer: could you just tell me which way would be the best: git version as advised by Damjan or standalone as you did for v1.99?
In the past I always used the stable version. However, I never used it together with tuxonice, but only with usual suspend to RAM, so I don't know how good the tuxonice support is in the stable release.
As I said, I haven't actually been maintaining this recently.
participants (3)
-
Damjan Georgievski
-
Guillaume ALAUX
-
Thomas Bächler