Re: [arch-general] deps not being properly recognized?
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sat Jun 20 21:37:11 -0400 2009:
Caleb Cushing wrote:
I can't figure out why pacman thinks that deps aren't being fulfilled.
Targets (1): perl-datetime-0.50-1 <snip> :: perl-datetime-format-strptime: requires perl-datetime>=0.4304
50 is not >= 4304
Allan
Hmm. That's kind of unfortuante. Chances are, .5x is actually meant to be greater than the .4xxx. Guess the best you can do is force it? :S -AT -- Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com) C:\> WIN Bad command or filename C:\> LOSE Loading Microsoft Windows ...
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Andrei Thorp
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sat Jun 20 21:37:11 -0400 2009:
Caleb Cushing wrote:
I can't figure out why pacman thinks that deps aren't being fulfilled.
Targets (1): perl-datetime-0.50-1 <snip> :: perl-datetime-format-strptime: requires perl-datetime>=0.4304
50 is not >= 4304
Allan
Hmm. That's kind of unfortuante. Chances are, .5x is actually meant to be greater than the .4xxx. Guess the best you can do is force it? :S
Yeah some people do terrible things with version numbers. They are NOT decimal numbers, they are independent numbers joined by dots. You can do pacman -Ud to skip dep checks if you're sure the deps are good.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Aaron Griffin
You can do pacman -Ud to skip dep checks if you're sure the deps are good.
right this is ultimately what I ended up doing... -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Andrei Thorp
-
Caleb Cushing