[arch-general] [signoff] dmraid-1.0.0rc16-3
HI, readded static dmraid again to fix: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18348 please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Tobias, did you receive the last mail from dmraid developer ? It seems we can solve this problem in a better way now with just a runtime option. And keep just the dynamic binary. I will see if I can get that running and working. Or do you still want to temporarily re-add static dmraid despites that last minute information ? In this case tell me as well and I will test your package. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
HI, readded static dmraid again to fix: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18348
please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Am 18.03.2010 19:31, schrieb Xavier Chantry:
Tobias, did you receive the last mail from dmraid developer ? It seems we can solve this problem in a better way now with just a runtime option. And keep just the dynamic binary. I will see if I can get that running and working.
Or do you still want to temporarily re-add static dmraid despites that last minute information ? In this case tell me as well and I will test your package.
It seems I didn't get that mail. If we can do that, we should test it, it's definitely better than the static solution. Can you forward it?
participants (3)
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Tobias Powalowski
-
Xavier Chantry