2010/10/19 Clément Démoulins :

Le 19/10/2010 16:50, Fess a écrit :

...

I think this is useful information: all soft installed from aur need to be reinstalled with changing line like "python setup.py blah-blah" to line "python2 setup.py blah-blah". Because some packages still aren't touched(e.g. charm). So, something like that.

And the dependencies must be updated from python to python2.

ugh, the impending doom, why didn't i prepare!!! all my development with pyjamas has halted until i get pyjamas itself working under py3k (or 2.7 even...) :-( oh well, most things seemed to have gone smooth; thanks guys. hakuna matata, it means no worries :-), i should have been working on py3k compliance awhile back, no one to blame but me! /whips self and hopes it's not too much work C Anthony

El 19/10/10 07:13, Heiko Baums dijo:

Am Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:54:16 +0200 schrieb Clément Démoulins :

...

Le 19/10/2010 16:50, Fess a écrit :

...

I think this is useful information: all soft installed from aur need to be reinstalled with changing line like "python setup.py blah-blah" to line "python2 setup.py blah-blah". Because some packages still aren't touched(e.g. charm). So, something like that.

And the dependencies must be updated from python to python2.

It would probably make sense to discuss this on aur-general instead of arch-general.

And for the affected packages you should probably write comments in the AUR in case a maintainer doesn't read the mailing list or has forgotten to updating a package.

maybe making a query to post a new comment on every AUR package that depends on python? -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:fauno@kiwwwi.com.ar omb:http://identi.ca/fauno blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044 http://librecultivo.org.ar http://parabolagnulinux.org

Le 20/10/2010 21:00, solsTiCe d'Hiver a écrit :

Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 18:54 +0200, Clément Démoulins a écrit :

...

And the dependencies must be updated from python to python2.

also I guess something like python>2.6.5 should become python2>2.6.5 which does not make any sense since python2 in archlinux is>= 2.7 and then could be shortened into python2 , no ?

Actually the last 2.6 version we had in extra provided 'python2', so you could still end up with a python2 dependency satisfied by 2.6.x on an outdated system :)