[arch-general] What is Arch doing vis-a-vis MySQL v. MariaDB?
Guys, Ran into a shock this morning when on one of my 2 lingering suse boxes updates replaced MySQL with MariaDB. After a brief bit of research, it seems that Monte (one of the MySQL devs) forked mysql into mariadb from the mysql code base in the 12/2009 timeframe when Oracle bought Sun to preserve MySQL and prevent against any funny business by Oracle in the future. According to statements made by Oracle, it is under an obligation to the EU to continue mysql largely in its present form and continue to enhance and make it freel available as part of the purchase. (See Oracle Statement): http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/042364 Suse evidently went with MariaDB and it was somewhat disconcerting to learn about the switch during an update. Has Arch considered what it will do in this situation, MariaDB?, MySQL? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
Ran into a shock this morning when on one of my 2 lingering suse boxes updates replaced MySQL with MariaDB. After a brief bit of research, it seems that Monte (one of the MySQL devs) forked mysql into mariadb from the mysql code base in the 12/2009 timeframe when Oracle bought Sun to preserve MySQL and prevent against any funny business by Oracle in the future. According to statements made by Oracle, it is under an obligation to the EU to continue mysql largely in its present form and continue to enhance and make it freel available as part of the purchase. (See Oracle Statement):
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/042364
Suse evidently went with MariaDB and it was somewhat disconcerting to learn about the switch during an update. Has Arch considered what it will do in this situation, MariaDB?, MySQL?
Definitely wouldn't do this around here without: 1. A big news item 2. Discussion first on the arch-dev-public ML Nor would we do this unless something really crazy changed in the MySQL situation, which for now it doesn't appear is the case. The most likely scenario would be packaging both and giving the users the option of which one to go with. -Dan
On 05/04/2010 08:55 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
Definitely wouldn't do this around here without: 1. A big news item 2. Discussion first on the arch-dev-public ML
Nor would we do this unless something really crazy changed in the MySQL situation, which for now it doesn't appear is the case. The most likely scenario would be packaging both and giving the users the option of which one to go with.
-Dan
Thanks Dan, That's reassuring to know and.. the right way to do it :p -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com
participants (2)
-
Dan McGee
-
David C. Rankin