[arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public] Welcoming Dave Reisner to the dev staff
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I've given him all the right permissions and such, and signed him up for the relevant mailing lists.
-Dan
Systemd to come? =)
2011/6/21 Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com>:
Systemd to come? =)
kernel-lts 2.6.32 is compatible with systemd anyway?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/6/21 Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com>:
Systemd to come? =)
kernel-lts 2.6.32 is compatible with systemd anyway?
Nope (from my own experience with a custom 2.6.33 kernel). For clarification (which I think everyone understands, but still) I was talking about default systemd. Having it as-is is still cool though.
On 06/21/2011 04:33 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I've given him all the right permissions and such, and signed him up for the relevant mailing lists.
-Dan
Systemd to come? =)
Congrats...... Hell of an addition to Devs IMO
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I've given him all the right permissions and such, and signed him up for the relevant mailing lists.
-Dan
Systemd to come? =)
Having given systemd a try, I hope not. For some reason it wouldn't make sure my /home was mounted. I can't count on that.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net> wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I've given him all the right permissions and such, and signed him up for the relevant mailing lists.
-Dan
Systemd to come? =)
Having given systemd a try, I hope not. For some reason it wouldn't make sure my /home was mounted. I can't count on that.
systemd is awesome, but I think the core should stay as lean as possible. In the future systemd may replace the systemV stuff, but for the time being I think there is little motivation to add it by default, Keep It Simple Silly
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 06:08:03 PM Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net> wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a little bit, and has taken initiative on a lot of initscripts/mkinitcpio/systemd type stuff. I think I've given him all the right permissions and such, and signed him up for the relevant mailing lists.
-Dan
Systemd to come? =)
Having given systemd a try, I hope not. For some reason it wouldn't make sure my /home was mounted. I can't count on that.
systemd is awesome, but I think the core should stay as lean as possible. In the future systemd may replace the systemV stuff, but for the time being I think there is little motivation to add it by default, Keep It Simple Silly
I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go against the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go against the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
I agree, no need to flame, we have flamed before on this :) In the end, I trust the Arch Devs to make the right call, they have not let us down before!
n Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go against the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way.
I agree, no need to flame, we have flamed before on this :)
In the end, I trust the Arch Devs to make the right call, they have not let us down before!
Agreed on this =)
here too :-)
Welcome Dave! (aka FalconIndy) Reisner's contributions and community involvement have been outstanding. I'm very pleased to see that he has decided to join the development team. -- Evan LeCompte On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net> wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 07:56:25 PM Bernardo Barros wrote:
here too :-)
+700 on this.
participants (6)
-
Bernardo Barros
-
Evan LeCompte
-
jwbirdsong
-
Oon-Ee Ng
-
Thomas S Hatch
-
Yaro Kasear