[arch-general] Xorg-server 1.8 - when?
Hello, I'd like to ask what are the plans for the xorg-server 1.8, especially now when RC1 of xorg-server 1.9 is out. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not demanding anything but I'm wondering what is holding back the move to [extra]. I'm using new xorg-server on two different computers (notebook with intel and desktop with nvidia's blob) for some time without any problems. Have a nice day, Lukas
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:14 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
Hello, I'd like to ask what are the plans for the xorg-server 1.8, especially now when RC1 of xorg-server 1.9 is out. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not demanding anything but I'm wondering what is holding back the move to [extra].
I'm using new xorg-server on two different computers (notebook with intel and desktop with nvidia's blob) for some time without any problems.
Though xorg-server 1.8 is not completely issue-free, I don't think 1.7 from extra isn't issue-free either. I've been running these packages for months now without much problems. Before we start moving xorg-server 1.8, I would like to know when we can move kernel26. The latest kernel has a lot of fixes for Intel and ATI/AMD DRM. Do we have really important open bugs for 2.6.34, or are we just waiting for the magic .1 release?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Jan de Groot <jan@jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:14 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
Hello, I'd like to ask what are the plans for the xorg-server 1.8, especially now when RC1 of xorg-server 1.9 is out. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not demanding anything but I'm wondering what is holding back the move to [extra].
I'm using new xorg-server on two different computers (notebook with intel and desktop with nvidia's blob) for some time without any problems.
Though xorg-server 1.8 is not completely issue-free, I don't think 1.7 from extra isn't issue-free either. I've been running these packages for months now without much problems. Before we start moving xorg-server 1.8, I would like to know when we can move kernel26. The latest kernel has a lot of fixes for Intel and ATI/AMD DRM. Do we have really important open bugs for 2.6.34, or are we just waiting for the magic .1 release?
In fact for xorg/kernel, I mean such big packages, there are quite a few bug reports in the bug tracker, and a few questions in our forum, which are a good signal in my opinion.
Hi, I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8 Regards, Gaurish Sharma
On 16 June 2010 12:17, Gaurish Sharma <contact@gaurishsharma.com> wrote:
Hi, I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards, Gaurish Sharma
At least nvidia-beta works fine.
* On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 June 2010 12:17, Gaurish Sharma <contact@gaurishsharma.com> wrote:
Hi, I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards, Gaurish Sharma
At least nvidia-beta works fine.
I am using xorg-server from about one month. No issues so far. Also I am using nvidia-beta (for 1.8 from versions 195.36.24 onwards,currently on 256.29). ------------------- Raghavendra D Prabhu
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 12:17:16 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi, I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards, Gaurish Sharma Working perfectly here:
$ pacman -Q xorg-server nvidia xorg-server 1.8.1-1 nvidia 195.36.24-2
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:47:16 +0530 Gaurish Sharma <contact@gaurishsharma.com> wrote:
Hi, I think Nvidia still does not work with 1.8
Regards, Gaurish Sharma
The last I heard was that the devs are waiting for the legazy nvidia drivers to be updated. (nvidia-173xx/96xx)
participants (7)
-
Gaurish Sharma
-
Jakob Gruber
-
Jan de Groot
-
Lukáš Jirkovský
-
Raghavendra D Prabhu
-
Øyvind Heggstad
-
甘露(Gan Lu)