[arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version. I've submitted this patch on aur mailing list and someone told me to post to the appropriate list. So, I post it here. Hopefully this will be the start of improving Arch Linux packaging, with patch contribution from Arch Linux community to improve packaging, especially regarding updates to out of date packages which is can't be reported on Flyspray. Because development is not just about fixing bugs. Making improvements is also part of development. ------ Upgrade links to version 2.13 Signed-off-by: Alif <alive4ever@live.com> --- trunk/PKGBUILD | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/trunk/PKGBUILD b/trunk/PKGBUILD index 85ce55c..3f2a3bf 100644 --- a/trunk/PKGBUILD +++ b/trunk/PKGBUILD @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ # Maintainer: Eric Bélanger <eric@archlinux.org> pkgname=links -pkgver=2.12 -pkgrel=2 +pkgver=2.13 +pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="A text WWW browser, similar to Lynx" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://links.twibright.com/" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ optdepends=('libx11: for using xlinks' 'libpng: for using xlinks' 'librsvg: for using xlinks') source=(http://links.twibright.com/download/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.bz2 links.desktop) -sha1sums=('952dfecded9496ff1a73184ce538d08dbbb5152b' +sha1sums=('ee5ef004723664d3928e29a603cb150db013603f' 'f600e27c2a71184444f7dd07a10230aa44463a02') prepare() { -- 2.9.2
On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote:
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version.
Posting this kind of patches will not lead to the package being updated magically. -- Jelle van der Waa
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote:
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version.
Posting this kind of patches will not lead to the package being updated magically.
The only thing to do to be able to update Arch Linux repository package is by being Arch Linux developer or trusted user.
On 08/05/16 at 01:01pm, Alive 4ever wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote:
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version.
Posting this kind of patches will not lead to the package being updated magically.
The only thing to do to be able to update Arch Linux repository package is by being Arch Linux developer or trusted user.
No, only a few developers have access to the [core] repository. Trusted users can only handle [community]. -- Jelle van der Waa
2.13 is now in [testing]. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
On 08/05/16 at 01:01pm, Alive 4ever wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote:
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version.
Posting this kind of patches will not lead to the package being updated magically.
The only thing to do to be able to update Arch Linux repository package is by being Arch Linux developer or trusted user.
No, only a few developers have access to the [core] repository. Trusted users can only handle [community].
-- Jelle van der Waa
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:57:35AM -0500, Jonathan Roemer wrote:
2.13 is now in [testing].
Confirmed. Thanks to eworm for taking care of the package.
participants (3)
-
Alive 4ever
-
Jelle van der Waa
-
Jonathan Roemer