[arch-general] gtklp shouldn't depend on cups
Hi, a gtklp installation should not pull the whole cups package, since its binaries only depend on libcups: $ ldd /usr/bin/gtklp | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb79ba000) $ ldd /usr/bin/gtklpq | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb799e000) $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 is owned by libcups 1.3.6-1 With `gtklp -S' one may specify remote cups servers so a missing local cups daemon is not making gtklp useless. Is this worth a PR? Thanks, Petar
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
Hi,
a gtklp installation should not pull the whole cups package, since its binaries only depend on libcups:
$ ldd /usr/bin/gtklp | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb79ba000) $ ldd /usr/bin/gtklpq | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb799e000) $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 is owned by libcups 1.3.6-1
With `gtklp -S' one may specify remote cups servers so a missing local cups daemon is not making gtklp useless.
Is this worth a PR?
Thanks,
Petar
Yes, file a bug report. What you wrote makes sense. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 04:09:35PM -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
Hi,
a gtklp installation should not pull the whole cups package, since its binaries only depend on libcups:
$ ldd /usr/bin/gtklp | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb79ba000) $ ldd /usr/bin/gtklpq | grep cups libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0xb799e000) $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 is owned by libcups 1.3.6-1
With `gtklp -S' one may specify remote cups servers so a missing local cups daemon is not making gtklp useless.
Is this worth a PR?
Thanks,
Petar
Yes, file a bug report. What you wrote makes sense.
participants (2)
-
Eric Belanger
-
Petar Bogdanovic