Re: [arch-general] AL gnustep-core implementation misses gnustep-back
On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to maintain GNUstep in official repos, we should drop oolite.
I'm going to drop oolite and remaining GNUstep packages on Monday, unless someone adopts the latter. Bartłomiej
On 11-01-18 15:48, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote:
On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to maintain GNUstep in official repos, we should drop oolite.
I'm going to drop oolite and remaining GNUstep packages on Monday, unless someone adopts the latter.
Bartłomiej
Not the answer I was hoping for, but if noone steps up that seems the best option. LW
On 2018-01-11 15:48, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via arch-general wrote:
On 2018-01-09 13:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
I'd like to keep maintaining oolite if it's not too much work but I'm definitely not going to touch GNUstep stuff. So if no one is going to maintain GNUstep in official repos, we should drop oolite.
I'm going to drop oolite and remaining GNUstep packages on Monday, unless someone adopts the latter.
Bartłomiej
With green light from Sven and no eager adopters, gnustep-{base,gui,make} and oolite are in AUR now. Bartłomiej
participants (2)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
LoneVVolf