[arch-general] archboot stills depends of portmap
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )
mathieu p wrote:
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )
This is a known issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15420 Allan
Am Sonntag 26 Juli 2009 schrieb Allan McRae:
mathieu p wrote:
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )
This is a known issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15420
Allan As long as vim is not fixed this cannot move in, install the version from testing or use latest git version. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
2009/7/26 Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 26 Juli 2009 schrieb Allan McRae:
mathieu p wrote:
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )
This is a known issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15420
Allan As long as vim is not fixed this cannot move in, install the version from testing or use latest git version. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Thanks, but it 's just because I made a local repo that I noticed it. I don't want to use it, but I found this troublesome. Regards.
Am Sonntag 26 Juli 2009 schrieb mathieu p:
2009/7/26 Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 26 Juli 2009 schrieb Allan McRae:
mathieu p wrote:
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by
rpcbind
some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )
This is a known issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15420
Allan
As long as vim is not fixed this cannot move in, install the version from testing or use latest git version. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Thanks, but it 's just because I made a local repo that I noticed it. I don't want to use it, but I found this troublesome.
Regards. Yes i'm aware of it but i can't really do something until those deps get cleaned up and move in. git repository has big changes, which will be available very soon.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Sun-2009/07/26-17:36 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
As long as vim is not fixed this cannot move in, install the version from testing or use latest git version.
Sorry to sound ignorant: what has an editor got to do with archboot?? clemens
Am Dienstag 28 Juli 2009 schrieb clemens fischer:
On Sun-2009/07/26-17:36 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
As long as vim is not fixed this cannot move in, install the version from testing or use latest git version.
Sorry to sound ignorant: what has an editor got to do with archboot??
clemens archboot depends are designed to generate a working image, vi on archboot is vim, as long as this is not fixed it cannot move in.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
archboot depends are designed to generate a working image, vi on archboot is vim, as long as this is not fixed it cannot move in.
could that editor be made pico(1), then? clemens
clemens fischer wrote:
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
archboot depends are designed to generate a working image, vi on archboot is vim, as long as this is not fixed it cannot move in.
could that editor be made pico(1), then?
clemens
pico isn't well maintained, nor does it have as friendly a license as nano. I'd suggest nano instead of pico if we go that route. -Tim
Am Donnerstag 30 Juli 2009 schrieb Tim Gelter:
clemens fischer wrote:
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
archboot depends are designed to generate a working image, vi on archboot is vim, as long as this is not fixed it cannot move in.
could that editor be made pico(1), then?
clemens
pico isn't well maintained, nor does it have as friendly a license as nano. I'd suggest nano instead of pico if we go that route. -TIM I will not change the editors on archboot images, nano and a not so big restricted version of vim will be used. New archboot package will show up soon in testing, with new images on server.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
participants (5)
-
Allan McRae
-
clemens fischer
-
mathieu p
-
Tim Gelter
-
Tobias Powalowski