[arch-mirrors] Best tier 1 mirror for tier 2 mirrors
Hi,
it seems like the score of a mirror is associated with the uDelay value. Because the uDelay value of my mirror is depending on the uDelay of my sync mirror i want to use the one with least uDelay.
Is there such a list or can i filter the mirrorlist for tier 1 mirrors with low uDelay?
Regards,
Daniel
On 05.05.2018 18:09, mail@dlaube.de wrote:
it seems like the score of a mirror is associated with the uDelay value. Because the uDelay value of my mirror is depending on the uDelay of my sync mirror i want to use the one with least uDelay. Is there such a list or can i filter the mirrorlist for tier 1 mirrors with low uDelay?
You can take a look at this[1], but really, I think while reducing the delay in general is good, you shouldn't force it. I suggest you use a mirror that is geographically close and provides good performance (throughput and latency). Sure, if the choice is between one that syncs once a day and one that syncs more often, pick the better one, but if the difference is between one hour or every minute, I wouldn't sweat it.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
Florian
I decided to switch my sync mirror. There is also the advantage of hosting iso's now. host: orbit-os.com sync mirror: rsync://mirror.f4st.host/archlinux/ iso's: yes
Could you update the details on the mirror page?
Daniel
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: arch-mirrors [mailto:arch-mirrors-bounces@archlinux.org] Im Auftrag von Florian Pritz via arch-mirrors Gesendet: Samstag, 5. Mai 2018 18:21 An: arch-mirrors@archlinux.org Cc: Florian Pritz bluewind@xinu.at Betreff: Re: [arch-mirrors] Best tier 1 mirror for tier 2 mirrors
On 05.05.2018 18:09, mail@dlaube.de wrote:
it seems like the score of a mirror is associated with the uDelay value. Because the uDelay value of my mirror is depending on the uDelay of my sync mirror i want to use the one with least uDelay. Is there such a list or can i filter the mirrorlist for tier 1 mirrors with low uDelay?
You can take a look at this[1], but really, I think while reducing the delay in general is good, you shouldn't force it. I suggest you use a mirror that is geographically close and provides good performance (throughput and latency). Sure, if the choice is between one that syncs once a day and one that syncs more often, pick the better one, but if the difference is between one hour or every minute, I wouldn't sweat it.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
Florian
On 08.05.2018 01:12, mail@dlaube.de wrote:
Could you update the details on the mirror page?
Done
Florian
participants (2)
-
Florian Pritz
-
mail＠dlaube.de