[arch-mirrors] multiple new Tier 1 mirrors
Hello, I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months). There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney. However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync. Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror? Carl Thompson Rackspace
Am 05.07.2013 17:04, schrieb Carl Thompson:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney.
Sounds great! How is you plan to sync those? Would you sync one of your server from one of our tier 1 mirrors and then sync the others from there?
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror?
That's not a problem as you also provide http. We just no longer advertise the use of ftp as it has all kinds of disadvantages. This would then only exclude mirrors that only offer ftp. So you should be fine. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
On 07/05/2013 10:11 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 17:04, schrieb Carl Thompson:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney. Sounds great! How is you plan to sync those? Would you sync one of your server from one of our tier 1 mirrors and then sync the others from there? Currently we sync from the closest tier 1 for other repos. We are working to re architect the sync procedures using jenkins instead of cron so that we can tier things such as sync 1 of our mirrors then invoke syncs from our other mirrors.
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror? That's not a problem as you also provide http. We just no longer advertise the use of ftp as it has all kinds of disadvantages. This would then only exclude mirrors that only offer ftp. So you should be fine. Good to know.
Carl Thompson Rackspace
Greetings,
Pierre
Hello, On 5 July 2013 17:04, Carl Thompson <carl.thompson@rackspace.com> wrote:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney.
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror?
No, the paragraph you reference to could be clearer written; we don't accept new ftp mirror urls. Your http and rsync urls can be admitted to our database. Please create a feature request on our bugtracker as per the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirroring. -Jakob
On 07/05/2013 06:17 PM, Carl Thompson wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:11 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 17:04, schrieb Carl Thompson:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney. Sounds great! How is you plan to sync those? Would you sync one of your server from one of our tier 1 mirrors and then sync the others from there? Currently we sync from the closest tier 1 for other repos. We are working to re architect the sync procedures using jenkins instead of cron so that we can tier things such as sync 1 of our mirrors then invoke syncs from our other mirrors.
if you are requesting to became tier 1, should you sync directly from us?
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror? That's not a problem as you also provide http. We just no longer advertise the use of ftp as it has all kinds of disadvantages. This would then only exclude mirrors that only offer ftp. So you should be fine.
Good to know.
Carl Thompson Rackspace
Greetings,
Pierre
_______________________________________________ arch-mirrors mailing list arch-mirrors@archlinux.org https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-mirrors
-- Ionuț
On 07/05/2013 02:26 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 07/05/2013 06:17 PM, Carl Thompson wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:11 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 17:04, schrieb Carl Thompson:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney. Sounds great! How is you plan to sync those? Would you sync one of your server from one of our tier 1 mirrors and then sync the others from there? Currently we sync from the closest tier 1 for other repos. We are working to re architect the sync procedures using jenkins instead of cron so that we can tier things such as sync 1 of our mirrors then invoke syncs from our other mirrors. if you are requesting to became tier 1, should you sync directly from us?
The wiki article just states to sync from a tier 1 mirror. If you have preferred mirrors I sync from for dallas, chicago, sydney, and hong kong I'd be more than happy to adjust the temporary syncing. When I get my task manager setup I will sync to one of my locations and push the changes out to the rest of my mirrors that way. Carl Thompson Rackspace
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the possibility of being an official mirror? That's not a problem as you also provide http. We just no longer advertise the use of ftp as it has all kinds of disadvantages. This would then only exclude mirrors that only offer ftp. So you should be fine. Good to know.
Carl Thompson Rackspace
Greetings,
Pierre
_______________________________________________ arch-mirrors mailing list arch-mirrors@archlinux.org https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-mirrors
participants (4)
-
Carl Thompson
-
Ionut Biru
-
Jakob Wadsager
-
Pierre Schmitz