Am Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:58:46 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>:
For a smooth support, install and upgrade procedure, I would do the renaming at the same time as moving in the native plugin. And I won't believe continued 64 bit support from Adobe until they start shipping it as a stable release.
Was the previous native 64 bit version every stable? As far as I know it was not. Is Flash stable at all? I second Pierre's suggestion. This way everyone who wants the "stable" 32 bit Flash can install lib32-flashplugin or bin32-flashplugin and everyone who wants the native 64 bit pre version can install flashplugin. Except there are serious instabilities, bugs or vulnerabilities. In this case the pre version should of course not be provided. But I'd choose one of the names lib32-flashplugin or bin32-flashplugin over flashplugin-nspluginwrapper because it's clearer and says what it's for. Notwithstanding the above, I think the package in [multilib] should be renamed. A package name without an appendix like lib32- is usually meant to be a native package for the corresponding architecture. Heiko