[arch-multilib] Relationship to [testing]?
Hi all, Will there be a [multilib-testing]? Additionally, I assume the specific nature of [multilib] means I can put it before/after [testing] and not have any problems with package overlap, is that correct? Ng Oon-Ee
Am 25.08.2010 06:06, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
Hi all,
Will there be a [multilib-testing]? Additionally, I assume the specific nature of [multilib] means I can put it before/after [testing] and not have any problems with package overlap, is that correct?
Ng Oon-Ee
For the time being there will be no testing.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 11:28 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 25.08.2010 06:06, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
Hi all,
Will there be a [multilib-testing]? Additionally, I assume the specific nature of [multilib] means I can put it before/after [testing] and not have any problems with package overlap, is that correct?
Ng Oon-Ee
For the time being there will be no testing.
Okay. It does seem that that could cause problems down the road? Since AFAIK the versions should match between lib32 and lib.
2010/8/25 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>:
Okay. It does seem that that could cause problems down the road? Since AFAIK the versions should match between lib32 and lib.
I assume we can use [community-testing], if we really need to.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 17:15 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote:
2010/8/25 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>:
Okay. It does seem that that could cause problems down the road? Since AFAIK the versions should match between lib32 and lib.
I assume we can use [community-testing], if we really need to. _______________________________________________ Fair enough. Which would imply that [multilib] should be at the bottom of pacman.conf?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com> wrote:
Fair enough. Which would imply that [multilib] should be at the bottom of pacman.conf?
Ideally. However, until the move is done, I would put it between [community] and [community-testing] for now
participants (3)
-
Jan Steffens
-
Ng Oon-Ee
-
Thomas Bächler