27 Jun
2007
27 Jun
'07
7:17 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:24:34PM +0200, Armin Luntzer wrote:
That's ok, our 3.0.5-1 is actually i686 3.0.5-2. The reason is that our update of pacman had been delayed a bit and the fix is already incorporated, but of course you couldn't have known this.
Hmm, would have been helpful all around if the pacman devs had bumped the version to indicate a bugfix. I'm not asking for 3.0.6, but would 3.0.5.1 have been too much trouble? ;) Matt