Marco Pensallorto wrote:
2006/11/7, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de <mailto:pierre@archlinux.de>>:
Am Dienstag, 7. November 2006 16:20 schrieb Alexander Baldeck: > It's simply not implemented, cvsup doesn't work on non-x86 because of
[CUT]
But abs can run with csup instead of cvsup. This works for x86_64; so chances are that it might work for ppc, too.
In fact it does. A simple symlink has solved the problem. I use abs from the x86 archlinux and already had
You could just have used CVS. But yeah, need to put that on the site. :)
a lot of packages compile smoothly out-of-the-box from the x86 abs tree (i.e. the _entire_ gnome tree plus any conceivable extras :) Others compile and work with minor modifications of PKGBUILD. That is why I don't really see the reason to diverge significantly from the i686 distro.
Hope to get a working binary repo of all these packages in the next few days.
Err, that's nothing to do with the abs script not working right? Since we have Gnome 2.14 in extra and 2.16.1 in testing you shouldn't have had to compile those. Yes, we hardly modify stuff. In 90% of all cases it just plain works. Some things are handcrafted though, such as the kernels (of course heh) and CPU dependent things like mplayer are not compiled in the same way necessarily cos since we orient on G3 and not G4 have to disable Altivec and put on some special G3+ flags.
About the fam script, please take a closer look at it and you'll easily realize that is plainly wrong. And that package is in current, so I guess nobody noticed the error. I'm pretty sure the i686 version never had that bug :)
Still don't have any clue about the kernel issue. I was forced to include static xfs support in order to have root mounted properly and boot the system. I did the mkinitcpio myself at least five times and I'm pretty sure xfs support was included but still... kernel panic'ed. That could be a minor issue but I'd like to get it work just right :)
In fact it had: http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/daemons/fam/fam.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.6&r2=text&tr2=1.8&diff_format=h Cheers, -O