Would it be possible to use an array (or dict ;-)) of architecture releases instead of multiple variables? This would restrict it to one line in the PKGBUILD. I guess we could also have convention of semi-colon separating the arch-pkg-rel variables to conserve space. Really don't like how long these things are getting... :( Dusty On 3/10/06, Maluvia <terakuma@imbris.net> wrote:
Do we really need more variables? Why not leave only one pkgrel number e.g. foo 1.0-1. If the x86_64 bit package needs a fix we would build only a 1.0-2 on x86_64 and let out not affected architectures. Next common release would be 1.0-3 for all archs.
Is it possible that way?
In the interest of keeping a single common PKGBUILD it sounds like Jason's solution would be the best, since it lets gensync/updatesync detect and pull the needed updates automatically. (If I understand correctly.) I don't even use ABS so I should probably shut-up, but since you asked . . . . . :)
Maluvia
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports