I Agree with syamajala, it would save a lot of work and not make people as confused though if we do this I think we'd need to put a big heading letting people know this isn't offical. On 2/25/06, seshu yamajala <syamajala@gamebox.net> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Our www.arch64.org website needs a whole rewrite. It should be fit into the www.archlinux.org (32bit) and www.archlinuxppc.org outfit. More features we want too.
well, since we're gonna use the official servers soon, why not just use their site? the web gui for packages could be changed a little to show archs. too.
- syamajala
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
-- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: MSG431@gmail.com