Re: [arch-ports] Who's working on Arch64 packages?

Ok, so the reason things are done the way they are right now is because I followed debian on amd64. They use the symlink and for 32bit backwards compatibility they setup a chroot. To me this seems like a much better idea than packaging both 32bit and 64bit apps for arch64.

I agree that Arch64 would be better with 32bit apps left for chroot or statically linked. Pure64 is much cleaner and simpler.

Also the symlink is supposed to be the other way around from /lib64 to /lib i've been meaning to fix that...

That makes much more sense to me - I will do a reinstall that way and see how it works. Thanks for the clarification.