... I fear there is a typo in you link, the "," is included. To you question:Hard to decide. Since we need i686 to boot with older machines, I would go for an iso that fits on a cd ...I could live to have two burnt images/cds for install/ emergency cases. Many thanks and kind regardsBernd From: Erich Eckner <arch@eckner.net> To: Discussion regarding the porting of Arch Linux to non-x86_64 architectures <arch-ports@archlinux.org> Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:36 AM Subject: [arch-ports] dual-iso Hi i686-fans, to not loose any potential new i686-users, I moved on by forking archiso and generating a current dual-bootable iso. Currently it resides at https://eckner.net/archlinux-2017.03.25-dual.iso, but maybe somewhen in the future we can move it to some more official place ;-) The source of archiso32 resides at github: github.com/archlinux32/archiso32. I stumbled upon one question: Is it desirable to have the iso dual bootable (i686 and x86_64) or do we want a solely i686-iso? The benefit of a i686-only-iso would be, that it'd fit on a cd. The benefit of a dual-bootable one would be, that we could use archiso32 as it is right now and that you can boot any machine (32 or 64 bits) with this - obviously. Any comments are appreciated. regards, Erich _______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports