Re: [arch-ports] Arch64 - call for a website maintainer
Hi, I have follow the discussion since it has began. I have a suggestion, I would copy the whole design of archlinux.org, if Judd give me a tarball of the exisiting webpage. So, there is the same design and it would be easy to merge it in the future... There is a place where information can be post or new packages will appear, since it will be merge... So, what do you think?? I would do the job, if you say yes. So think about it.. Bye, Daniel -- Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft f�r 0,- Euro*! "Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
On 3/2/06, Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
I have follow the discussion since it has began. I have a suggestion, I would copy the whole design of archlinux.org, if Judd give me a tarball of the exisiting webpage.
I don't think its a good idea. Have you looked at the sources for the existing page? Its got crazy spans, tables, hard to read, I don't know how Judd manages to maintain it. :-D I think its actually time for the main archlinux.org site to be rewritten in nice clean XHTML 1.0 and CSS... now we're talking a whole new level, but perhaps its time to think about organizing a new al.org web design that incorporates arch64 (and possibly other ports) into the new main site. Would be cool if somebody with a whole pile of time on their hands and l33t web dev skills could integrate the forum, wiki, art.archlinux, documentation, planet, dev blog, ports, and main site into one super-charged new ArchLinux portal. Whole pile of time on their hands..... good luck. :( Dusty Dusty
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:29:46AM -0500, Dusty Phillips wrote:
I don't think its a good idea. Have you looked at the sources for the existing page? Its got crazy spans, tables, hard to read, I don't know how Judd manages to maintain it. :-D I think its actually time for the main archlinux.org site to be rewritten in nice clean XHTML 1.0 and CSS...
That would super duper. (yea that's right, I said "super duper") The arch page was originally slapped together for me back in 2002 (or was it 2003?) by a fellow co-worker who had more free time than I. If someone were inclined to re-design the thing, I'd be a happy geek. The PHP portions should be re-coded too, perhaps in a proper framework. They're all pretty adhoc right now, and it's ugly. - J
On 3/2/06, Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> wrote:
That would super duper. (yea that's right, I said "super duper")
The arch page was originally slapped together for me back in 2002 (or was it 2003?) by a fellow co-worker who had more free time than I. If someone were inclined to re-design the thing, I'd be a happy geek. The PHP portions should be re-coded too, perhaps in a proper framework. They're all pretty adhoc right now, and it's ugly.
would you guys accept help from a debian user? :P -- Martin Lefebvre eMail: dadexter@gmail.com WWW: https://sigterm.homeunix.com Registered Linux #349269 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT dpu s:-- a- C+++ UL++++ P-- L++++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K- w--- O- M-- V-- PS PE Y PGP-- t+++ 5- X R- tv++ b+ DI-- D+ G-- e h++ r++ y** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:33:18PM -0500, Martin Lefebvre wrote:
On 3/2/06, Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> wrote:
That would super duper. (yea that's right, I said "super duper")
The arch page was originally slapped together for me back in 2002 (or was it 2003?) by a fellow co-worker who had more free time than I. If someone were inclined to re-design the thing, I'd be a happy geek. The PHP portions should be re-coded too, perhaps in a proper framework. They're all pretty adhoc right now, and it's ugly.
would you guys accept help from a debian user? :P
*hiss* Nah, just kidding. I don't judge. :) - J
On 3/2/06, Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> wrote:
*hiss*
Nah, just kidding. I don't judge. :)
Good :P -- Martin Lefebvre eMail: dadexter@gmail.com WWW: https://sigterm.homeunix.com Registered Linux #349269 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT dpu s:-- a- C+++ UL++++ P-- L++++ E--- W+++ N++ o-- K- w--- O- M-- V-- PS PE Y PGP-- t+++ 5- X R- tv++ b+ DI-- D+ G-- e h++ r++ y** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
What do you think about the PPC website? I like it's simplicity! http://www.archlinuxppc.org/joomla/ Regards, Moritz Judd Vinet wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:29:46AM -0500, Dusty Phillips wrote:
I don't think its a good idea. Have you looked at the sources for the existing page? Its got crazy spans, tables, hard to read, I don't know how Judd manages to maintain it. :-D I think its actually time for the main archlinux.org site to be rewritten in nice clean XHTML 1.0 and CSS...
That would super duper. (yea that's right, I said "super duper")
The arch page was originally slapped together for me back in 2002 (or was it 2003?) by a fellow co-worker who had more free time than I. If someone were inclined to re-design the thing, I'd be a happy geek. The PHP portions should be re-coded too, perhaps in a proper framework. They're all pretty adhoc right now, and it's ugly.
- J
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
Perhaps a speeling checkerr would be in order: <http://www.archlinuxppc.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=28> (Grin) ("Dowloads")
What do you think about the PPC website? I like it's simplicity! http://www.archlinuxppc.org/joomla/
Regards, Moritz
Judd Vinet wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:29:46AM -0500, Dusty Phillips wrote:
I don't think its a good idea. Have you looked at the sources for the existing page? Its got crazy spans, tables, hard to read, I don't know how Judd manages to maintain it. :-D I think its actually time for the main archlinux.org site to be rewritten in nice clean XHTML 1.0 and CSS...
That would super duper. (yea that's right, I said "super duper")
The arch page was originally slapped together for me back in 2002 (or was it 2003?) by a fellow co-worker who had more free time than I. If someone were inclined to re-design the thing, I'd be a happy geek. The PHP portions should be re-coded too, perhaps in a proper framework. They're all pretty adhoc right now, and it's ugly.
- J
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Dusty Phillips wrote:
I don't think its a good idea. Have you looked at the sources for the existing page? Its got crazy spans, tables, hard to read, I don't know how Judd manages to maintain it. :-D I think its actually time for the main archlinux.org site to be rewritten in nice clean XHTML 1.0 and CSS... now we're talking a whole new level, but perhaps its time to think about organizing a new al.org web design that incorporates arch64 (and possibly other ports) into the new main site. Would be cool if somebody with a whole pile of time on their hands and l33t web dev skills could integrate the forum, wiki, art.archlinux, documentation, planet, dev blog, ports, and main site into one super-charged new ArchLinux portal.
Whole pile of time on their hands..... good luck. :(
Dusty
i know this sounds crazy, but i think lisp would be excellent for this job. Everything could probably be integrated and it wouldn't take that long to do. Sadly, my lisp skills are still not that great. - Syamajala
participants (7)
-
Daniel Isenmann
-
Dusty Phillips
-
Judd Vinet
-
Martin Lefebvre
-
Moritz Alexander Esser
-
seshu yamajala
-
w9ya＠arrl.net