[arch-ports] packages to be deleted
Hi all, the process of deleting old(?) unbuildable packages from our repositories is not yet automated. And I'd like to run the first few iterations of it manually to not wipe our repositories ;-) Therefore I put a list of to-be-deleted packages on https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/to-delete Note that the filenames may not match to 100%, because due to laziness I always put the "epoch" and "sub-pkgrel" in the version information. If you have any objections on removing those packages, now is the time to complain. For further information, there is a list of explicitely black listed packages here: https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/blacklist.html regards, deep42thought
1) The URL https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/to-delete doesn't work. 2) I'm assuming these are all 32-bit packages from the name. If not the case please let me know. 3) The https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/blacklist.html URL is ok. Regards, Steve Dupuis Ottawa, Canada On 2018-02-05 03:46 PM, Erich Eckner wrote:
Hi all,
the process of deleting old(?) unbuildable packages from our repositories is not yet automated. And I'd like to run the first few iterations of it manually to not wipe our repositories ;-) Therefore I put a list of to-be-deleted packages on https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/to-delete Note that the filenames may not match to 100%, because due to laziness I always put the "epoch" and "sub-pkgrel" in the version information.
If you have any objections on removing those packages, now is the time to complain. For further information, there is a list of explicitely black listed packages here: https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/blacklist.html
regards, deep42thought
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports
Hi all, On 05.02.2018 21:52, Steve Dupuis wrote:
1) The URL https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/to-delete doesn't work.
The url works - it is just that it's an unformatted text file (and possibly served out as "binary"). It may be thus, that your browser does strange things with it (mine refuses to show it and says he wants do download it). If you prefer, there is now also a dynamically generated list at https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/scripts/to-delete.php which is also html formatted.
2) I'm assuming these are all 32-bit packages from the name. If not the case please let me know.
yes, all 32-bit packages - this is for archlinux32 - sry, I forgot to mention :-)
3) The https://buildmaster.archlinux32.org/blacklist.html URL is ok.
Regards, Steve Dupuis Ottawa, Canada
regards, deep42thought
The base package for python2-nautilus was changed from python2-nautilus to nautilus-python, therefore it should be kept. What is the reason to drop calligra and krita packages? -- György Balló Arch Linux Trusted User
Hi, On 06.02.2018 01:34, Balló György wrote:
The base package for python2-nautilus was changed from python2-nautilus to nautilus-python, therefore it should be kept.
ah, this is exactly, why I want to do this thing manually for now - I'll have a look what's going on there / how to solve this :-)
What is the reason to drop calligra and krita packages? They both depend on vc, which is black listed: '"Unsupported target architecture 'i686'. No support_???.cpp file exists for this architecture", complain upstream if you need it'
cheers, deep42thought
2018-02-06 6:08 GMT+01:00 Erich Eckner
What is the reason to drop calligra and krita packages? They both depend on vc, which is black listed: '"Unsupported target architecture 'i686'. No support_???.cpp file exists for this architecture", complain upstream if you need it'
You can simply remove 'vc' from makedepends and build the packages. It's optional at build time, required only for vectorization support: https://github.com/KDE/calligra/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L576 https://github.com/KDE/krita/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L587 -- György Balló Arch Linux Trusted User
participants (3)
-
Balló György
-
Erich Eckner
-
Steve Dupuis