[arch-ports] Question about stepping on peoples' toes?
Hey PPC team: Well all 3 active ones of us anyway. I wanted to clarify something before I got much further but I've been basically picking and choosing things to update with i686 as I go, not really giving any heed to specific packages. Is there a problem with that. I feel like since we're such a small team there wouldn't be a problem (we all have more than enough work to do). Let me know if it is one though. Zac
That's pretty much how we do it. I know Armin and I have gotten into to the habbit of setting what we're working on in our jabber status message s though, to avoid some confusion ;) --Greg Zac Brown wrote:
Hey PPC team:
Well all 3 active ones of us anyway. I wanted to clarify something before I got much further but I've been basically picking and choosing things to update with i686 as I go, not really giving any heed to specific packages. Is there a problem with that. I feel like since we're such a small team there wouldn't be a problem (we all have more than enough work to do). Let me know if it is one though.
Zac
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
We're 4 actually :) I agree with Greg, that's the way we do it. Just make sure to rebuild all affected packages or ask us for help if there are library .so bumps (use checkpkg and lddd from cvs-arch) also please don't move stuff to current that's in testing on i686 (I know I don't follow my own advices at times ;-) - Armin Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 03:44 -0400 schrieb Greg Helton:
That's pretty much how we do it. I know Armin and I have gotten into to the habbit of setting what we're working on in our jabber status message s though, to avoid some confusion ;)
--Greg
Zac Brown wrote:
Hey PPC team:
Well all 3 active ones of us anyway. I wanted to clarify something before I got much further but I've been basically picking and choosing things to update with i686 as I go, not really giving any heed to specific packages. Is there a problem with that. I feel like since we're such a small team there wouldn't be a problem (we all have more than enough work to do). Let me know if it is one though.
Zac
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
_______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list arch-ports@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-ports
participants (3)
-
Armin Luntzer
-
Greg Helton
-
Zac Brown