Hi list,
I've recently started working with the snd editor (the audacity debacle gave me that last push...), and I was just wondering what the rationale is for shipping snd with ruby support, instead of the default scheme? Would it be an idea to keep the snd package in community with the scheme default, and instead create a snd-{ruby,forth} package in aur instead for those that use those?
Best,
Kenneth
--
Roosna & Flak - Contemporary Dance & Music
Web: roosnaflak.com
Code: {github,gitlab}.com/kflak
Mastodon: @kf@sonomu.club
Hello,
I report a following error when I push Edit button on qsampler.
"Channel 0
Could not launch an appropriate instrument editor for the given instrument!
Make sure you have an appropriate instrument editor like 'gigedit'
installed and that it placed its mandatory DLL file into the sampler's
plugin directory."
I've found the installation of
/usr/lib/linuxsampler/plugins/libgigeditlinuxsamplerplugin.so .
And also set LINUXSAMPLER_PLUGIN_DIR variable on .bashrc.
I've found the same topic on the arch-proaudio mailing list's archive.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-proaudio/2018-February/thread.ht…
But the problem is different because there is the
libgigeditlinuxsamplerplugin.so.
And gigedit as a stand alone work fine.
Best regards,
Akihiro