Hey hey, thanks for the new list! <3
I wondered, if there is a kernel for Arch that has all the RT support configured/patched? I didn't spot any in the repositories (both with pacman and AUR).
TIA and best wishes,
Jeanette
-------- * website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound * SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c
E-mail my heart and say our love will never die... <3 (Britney Spears)
On 8 December 2017 at 04:10, Jeanette C. julien@mail.upb.de wrote:
Hey hey, thanks for the new list! <3
I wondered, if there is a kernel for Arch that has all the RT support configured/patched? I didn't spot any in the repositories (both with pacman and AUR).
Didn't you find this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-rt/ ?
Dec 7 2017, Rashif Ray Rahman has written: ...
Didn't you find this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-rt/ ?
Strangely enough: I didn't before. Though linux-rt is out of date, but linux-rt-bfq appears to be state of the art.
Thanks a lot and best wishes,
Jeanette
-- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
-------- * website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound * SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c
E-mail my heart and say our love will never die... <3 (Britney Spears)
On 2017-12-07 23:30:42 (+0100), Jeanette C. wrote:
Dec 7 2017, Rashif Ray Rahman has written: ...
Didn't you find this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-rt/ ?
Strangely enough: I didn't before. Though linux-rt is out of date, but linux-rt-bfq appears to be state of the art.
It would be nice to have a linux-rt in the main repositories, although I also understand, that it's a lot of work and I'm not so sure, I would personally be up for it. Also, I'm unsure, how much other TUs and developers will like "yet another kernel" ;-)
However, I use it frequently and it has saved me quite some trouble over the years.
On 8 December 2017 at 04:40, David Runge dave@sleepmap.de wrote:
It would be nice to have a linux-rt in the main repositories, although I also understand, that it's a lot of work and I'm not so sure, I would personally be up for it.
As is already evident, I'm not up for it either but has been on the TODO for like ages...
Also, I'm unsure, how much other TUs and developers will like "yet another kernel" ;-)
It could be brought into community, just have to run the request through the team. The resistance is mainly due to the maintenance burden that comes with a custom kernel.
arch-proaudio@lists.archlinux.org