On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:44:12PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:38:28PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
We don't need to invoke svn copy on each file; it accepts multiple arguments. This cut Allan's time releasing one patch-friendly package from 5 minutes to 2 minutes.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> --- archrelease | 5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/archrelease b/archrelease index 2f6a563..7bb4c8a 100755 --- a/archrelease +++ b/archrelease @@ -52,9 +52,8 @@ for tag in "$@"; do svn add --parents -q "repos/$tag" fi
- for file in "${known_files[@]}"; do - svn copy -q -r HEAD "$trunk/$file" "repos/$tag/" - done + # copy all files at once from trunk to the subdirectory in repos/ + svn copy -q -r HEAD ${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/} "repos/$tag/"
+1 from me. I wondered why we were looping over the single files in the first place. However, if we copy from current HEAD anyway, I don't see any reason to not just use `svn copy -q -r HEAD "$trunk/" "repos/$tag/"` here.
+1 from me provided we quote the array expansion.
$ known_files=(foo "bar baz") trunk=/some/path
$ printf '%s\n' ${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/} /some/path/foo /some/path/bar baz
$ printf '%s\n' "${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/}" /some/path/foo /some/path/bar baz
Well, how is this superior to just copying the whole trunk directory?
No idea. Will svn copy pick up files that aren't tracked? (packages, src/, pkg/, signatures...) d