On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
"Jason St. John" <jstjohn@purdue.edu> wrote:
From: "Jason St. John" <jstjohn@purdue.edu>
pacman 4.1 greatly simplied the use of VCS PKGBUILDs. Usage of VCS PKGBUILDs is documented in PKGBUILD(5) and on the ArchWiki. Including a separate prototype for each VCS is unnecessary, and they should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Jason St. John <jstjohn@purdue.edu> --- prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto | 64 --------------------------------------- prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto | 65 ---------------------------------------- prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto | 66 ----------------------------------------- prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto | 64 --------------------------------------- prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto | 65 ---------------------------------------- prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto | 63 --------------------------------------- 6 files changed, 387 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto
If I remember correctly, cvs and darcs are not supported in pacman yet. I know at least darcs isn't. So they shouldn't be removed. - -- Sent from my Android Phone. Daniel Wallace Arch Linux Trusted User GTManfred -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.0.8
iQFUBAEBCAA+BQJRYhqXNxxEYW5pZWwgV2FsbGFjZSAoZ3RtYW5mcmVkKSA8ZGFu aWVsLndhbGxhY2VAZ2F0ZWNoLmVkdT4ACgkQX6XlVE8BDUgPZggAnHcAnrN6vrQf dlSMpZBZeoR7B2yGtsQkermLuBrBXknsHFc8eKd/yoJ6T7DSOnaMZ0nWT2ddFPeo XOVU3b3ElyQUb7cx97MkTOkp/Lj9hjTU6oKYPwn/m+/KDTmosR+IXlC61Bri6dYW lUD9A4lAGtUL/nC1u9MqCcpHpKqIm0SF/laoXAZH7o1Iwlr2ibzZbNwOYTdr5UN+ 74pN2/eZ9e4Sink1x4Z4bxnxL4SREimkOnf3P7DZ4fz8+HeLClz/XWR1OoFZ2kln d+7w359QITzyws3Nxs6O1eabdB8LLhFW7ZLTAMKueBjGP2PQ//te968A0idT4mSz BgiOSm/xpQ== =npC0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yes, you are correct. I just checked PKGBUILD(5). I have resubmitted this patch here: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2013-April/003723.html Thanks for catching this! Jason