On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:34:23AM +1100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Dave Reisner <d@falconindy.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 03:41:58AM +1100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Now we fail silently if the file exists, which means there is no easy way to overwrite binaries.
I think it makes the most sense to do the following: 1) add all the busybox stuff as a basic system; 2) overwrite some of the links with any binaries we add to base hook; 3) allow users to write their own hooks to overwrite even more stuff.
This can now be done by this hook.
[this should have been part of the previous patch serios, it got lost on the way, sorry about that.] Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> --- functions | 4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/functions b/functions index ef4463e..54c1034 100644 --- a/functions +++ b/functions @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ _add_file() { # $3: mode
(( $# == 3 )) || return $EINVAL - [[ -e "$BUILDROOT$1" ]] && return $EEXIST
(( QUIET )) || plain "adding file: %s" "$1" command install -Dm$3 "$2" "$BUILDROOT$1" @@ -106,10 +105,9 @@ _add_symlink() { # $2: target of $1
(( $# == 2 )) || return $EINVAL - [[ -L "$BUILDROOT$1" ]] && return $EEXIST
(( QUIET )) || plain "adding symlink: %s -> %s" "$1" "$2" - ln -s "$2" "$BUILDROOT$1" + ln -sf "$2" "$BUILDROOT$1"
This will do the wrong thing when a symlink exists and points to a directory. I think it's as simple as passing the -n flag to ln.
Ah, I had not thought of that scenario. Sounds like what you propose is reasonable, I'll push a new version to my repo after testing/thinking about it a bit.
It's something that's bitten me way too many times when switching symlinks to different doc roots on web servers ;)
More importantly: do you agree with the general approach (of allowing files to be overwritten)?
-t
Yeah, I think I do. d