18 Nov
2013
18 Nov
'13
10:07 a.m.
No exceptions? In this case, it is not very sensible, is it? To me, these questions are no longer about netctl 1.4-2. I even think it is a very good rule to have all [core] packages go through [testing] first. However, there might be cases where it is not what you'd want (of which this incarnation of netctl might be one). On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 18/11/13 19:47, Jouke Witteveen wrote:
Is there a reason the patched version (thanks) is going through [testing]? We now have a package that causes problems in [core] and a version that doesn't cause these problems and for the rest is not worse in [testing].
Just curious, - Jouke
All [core] packages MUST go through [testing].
Allan