On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> --- rc.sysinit | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit index 733149c..6a01029 100755 --- a/rc.sysinit +++ b/rc.sysinit @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ if ! /bin/mountpoint -q /dev; then fi /bin/mkdir -p /run/lock /dev/{pts,shm} /bin/chmod 1777 /run/lock -/bin/mountpoint -q /dev/pts || /bin/mount /dev/pts &> /dev/null \ +/bin/mountpoint -q /dev/pts || /bin/mount -n /dev/pts &> /dev/null \ || /bin/mount -n -t devpts devpts /dev/pts -o mode=620,gid=5,nosuid,noexec -/bin/mountpoint -q /dev/shm || /bin/mount /dev/shm &> /dev/null \ +/bin/mountpoint -q /dev/shm || /bin/mount -n /dev/shm &> /dev/null \ || /bin/mount -n -t tmpfs shm /dev/shm -o mode=1777,nosuid,nodev
# remount root ro to allow for fsck later on, we remount now to
Thanks for the patch!
Why doing this ? With /etc/mtab linked to /proc/mounts, why just every time calling in with -n ?
We don't yet have the symlink, until we do we should use "-n" here. I'm planning to look into the remaining downsides of using libmount and symlinking mtab to /proc/self/monuts, to see if we can make the switch. "The others" are doing it, so hopefully we can join soon. If anyone knows of problems, I'd be interested to know. Cheers, Tom