On 10/29/07, Simo Leone email@example.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:50:33PM -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
I deleted the "origin" branch, as this doesn't belong in a repo such as this one (and it was a subset of master anyway, no loss).
Just a heads up.
Also, I'm wondering about what the different branches in there are intended for. There are master, testing, and stable. Most git projects are set up where master is what would be considered 'stable', that's why I'm wondering.
On the same train of thought: I'd like to fix the older commits with just usernames on them. Problem being this will wreck the history since it'd change the sha sums of all the commits.
Same goes for the AUTHORS file...
Would anyone be terribly averse to this? It just looks better..
Not sure what you are envisioning as far as changes go. Are you thinking of changing people's names?