On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
I don't think we should add hacks to our packages to allow things that are not supported by upstream. The proper solution to this would be to file a feature request against udevadm, and in the meantime keep some script that does what you want (if it can be done). Agreed- can you point me to the udev bug tracker so I can file said request?
They don't have one. Any bugs go to the ML: <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>. Upstream says: we should be installing a symlink [1], which
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote: potentially means we don't have to make changes elsewhere or tightly couple versions of our packages. On a related note from the same, for restarting, the `udevadm control --exit && udevd --daemon` process should work for restarting for us old farts not using systemd and not restarting our boxes once a week. I believe you could also run `udevadm trigger` if you were worried you missed any events. -Dan [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=131835335207882&w=2