On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Tom Gundersen email@example.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Victor Lowther firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011 4:42 AM, "Tom Gundersen" email@example.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Seblu firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
You can see 2 patches.
Second fix bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23373
As you wrote the patched referenced int the FS, could I get your ACK on Seb's second patch (or an explanation if the change was intentional):
The change was intentional, but I did not know the original unquoted expansion was on purpose. Seb's patch is fine.
PS I don't know if it was intentional or worked by accident. I think there are several such features, especially in the networking code. I think we should at some point document exactly what we support (in the code) and treat everything else as bugs.