I'm new to arch, didn't know where to send this. I just took some advice from the #archlinux chan. And um... you say the code could be written even by you. It probably could, but i don't know how. That's why i posted this. --- Jason Chu <jason@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:14:39PM -0700, Tim Goff wrote:
this as probably been posted before but here's my idea:
Instead of current [################] 100%
38K 14.2K/s 00:00:02 extra [################] 100%
147K 14.8K/s 00:00:10
We should change pacman to Instead of current [C...............] 0%
38K 14.2K/s 00:00:02 Instead of current [ C........] 50%
38K 14.2K/s 00:00:02 current [ C...] 75%
147K 14.8K/s 00:00:10 Current [ C] 100%
147K 14.8K/s 00:00:10
Just to reflect the name.
I hate to say this, but I don't think this is technically interesting or really all that difficult to do. A patch could be written very easily, even by you, to implement something like this and submit it as a bug.
I think a request like this should go to the regular arch mailing list.
Jason
-- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are.
My old gpg key expired, the new one is available from keyservers. I was stupid enough not to realize this before it was too late, so I am not able to sign my new key with my old key. If this assurance isn't enough, please contact me.
ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush