From: Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@parabola.nu> Following is a test-case for db-remove demonstrating a case where I'm not sure what the intended behavior is. Note that the test-case is identical to the existing "remove multiple packages" test-case, except that 'pkg-single-arch' has been added to the pkgs=() array. With pacman 5.0, the test-case would have passed, but with pacman 5.1, the test-case fails. With the pacman 5.1 version of repo-remove, if any of the named packages are not found, the entire transaction is aborted, and *no* packages are removed. With 5.0, it would have said "error", but still proceeded to remove the other named packages. So, in my test-case, because 'pkg-single-arch' is an x86_64 only package (while the others are x86_64 and i686), db-remove succeeds on x86_64, but fails to remove anything on i686 because pkg-single-arch isn't present there. Also note that despite saying "ERROR" and failing to do anything, db-remove has a 0 exit-code; the test-case failure doesn't happen until it calls checkRemovedPackage. So, what's the desired behavior here? Ignore packages that are already missing from the repo, or abort if any of the named packages aren't found? --- test/cases/db-remove.bats | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/cases/db-remove.bats b/test/cases/db-remove.bats index fe373bc..d72c9cf 100644 --- a/test/cases/db-remove.bats +++ b/test/cases/db-remove.bats @@ -44,6 +44,27 @@ load ../lib/common done } +@test "remove multiple packages - some single arch" { + local arches=('i686' 'x86_64') + local pkgs=('pkg-simple-a' 'pkg-simple-b' 'pkg-split-a' 'pkg-split-b' 'pkg-simple-epoch' 'pkg-single-arch') + local pkgbase + local arch + + for pkgbase in ${pkgs[@]}; do + releasePackage extra ${pkgbase} + done + + db-update + + for arch in ${arches[@]}; do + db-remove extra ${arch} ${pkgs[@]} + done + + for pkgbase in ${pkgs[@]}; do + checkRemovedPackage extra ${pkgbase} + done +} + @test "remove any packages" { local pkgs=('pkg-any-a' 'pkg-any-b') local pkgbase -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker