[arch-projects] [initscripts] new release soon
Hi guys, I'm thinking of making a release in the next few days. The reason I want it soon is to add deprecation comments to MODULES/MOD_AUTOLOAD. Aside from that we have some bug fixes, a new network system and lots of improvements to rc.d. If anyone have any outstanding patches, please remind me. And it would be great if people could try out the current git to make sure there are no problems I have missed ;-) [I am aware of the stuff being discussed by Eric and Sebastien, so if you guys agree soon, I'll include it, otherwise we can just wait for the next release (at the current rate, in a month's time)]. Cheers, Tom
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of making a release in the next few days. The reason I want it soon is to add deprecation comments to MODULES/MOD_AUTOLOAD. Aside from that we have some bug fixes, a new network system and lots of improvements to rc.d.
If anyone have any outstanding patches, please remind me. And it would be great if people could try out the current git to make sure there are no problems I have missed ;-)
There's one of my patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000883.html It'll need to be refactored because of Dave's patch. Feel free to do it. I'm not very confortable with git and I usually messed up when I had to do this kind of thing in the past.
[I am aware of the stuff being discussed by Eric and Sebastien, so if you guys agree soon, I'll include it, otherwise we can just wait for the next release (at the current rate, in a month's time)].
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of making a release in the next few days. The reason I want it soon is to add deprecation comments to MODULES/MOD_AUTOLOAD. Aside from that we have some bug fixes, a new network system and lots of improvements to rc.d.
If anyone have any outstanding patches, please remind me. And it would be great if people could try out the current git to make sure there are no problems I have missed ;-)
There's one of my patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000883.html It'll need to be refactored because of Dave's patch. Feel free to do it. I'm not very confortable with git and I usually messed up when I had to do this kind of thing in the past.
Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any reason you did not include this with the others? Should I just rebase it? -t
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of making a release in the next few days. The reason I want it soon is to add deprecation comments to MODULES/MOD_AUTOLOAD. Aside from that we have some bug fixes, a new network system and lots of improvements to rc.d.
If anyone have any outstanding patches, please remind me. And it would be great if people could try out the current git to make sure there are no problems I have missed ;-)
There's one of my patch: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000883.html It'll need to be refactored because of Dave's patch. Feel free to do it. I'm not very confortable with git and I usually messed up when I had to do this kind of thing in the past.
Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any reason you did not include this with the others? Should I just rebase it? Yes. Output is not consistent with the rest. That's why I had not taken. (e.g. dot at end of line)
archipel ~/initscripts 0 # rc.d start toto sshd :: Error: Daemon script toto does not exist. :: Starting Secure Shell Daemon Looking at the information I had, I thought it was better, do not display error message that displays this. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Hi Seblu, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any reason you did not include this with the others? Should I just rebase it? Yes. Output is not consistent with the rest. That's why I had not taken. (e.g. dot at end of line)
archipel ~/initscripts 0 # rc.d start toto sshd :: Error: Daemon script toto does not exist. :: Starting Secure Shell Daemon
Looking at the information I had, I thought it was better, do not display error message that displays this.
Sorry, I should have waited for your reply before pushing. I think it makes sense to show an error message of some sort though. Except for removing the trailing dot, any other suggestions for how it should look like? (I'll have to roll 2011.6.2 pretty soon anyway, so I'll include a fix there). Cheers, Tom
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> wrote:
Hi Seblu,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
Thanks. I had indeed forgotten this. Looks good to me. Seblu, any reason you did not include this with the others? Should I just rebase it? Yes. Output is not consistent with the rest. That's why I had not taken. (e.g. dot at end of line)
archipel ~/initscripts 0 # rc.d start toto sshd :: Error: Daemon script toto does not exist. :: Starting Secure Shell Daemon
Looking at the information I had, I thought it was better, do not display error message that displays this.
Sorry, I should have waited for your reply before pushing. No problem, my company is undergoing restructuring, it take me a lot of time and I'm not very reactive atm.
I think it makes sense to show an error message of some sort though. Except for removing the trailing dot, any other suggestions for how it should look like? (I'll have to roll 2011.6.2 pretty soon anyway, so I'll include a fix there). Currently i don't have a good output. Its why i think no output (and an error code) suffice. But you want a message I'll try to find a solution asap.
Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
Currently i don't have a good output. Its why i think no output (and an error code) suffice. But you want a message I'll try to find a solution asap.
It can wait, lots of stuff going on atm in initscripts, so we'll clean this up for the next release (in a month's time). So just get to it whenever you have time. Cheers, Tom
participants (3)
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Seblu
-
Tom Gundersen