On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:14:14 +0200 Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:12:02 +0200 Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
Wait, weren't these going to be dual-arch images?
i will do dual-arch images yes. haven't had time yet. This shouldn't hold anyone back from testing the normal images though.
Dieter
okay guys, I ran Gerardo's archiso2dual script and wow. it seems to work nicely. Note that I have not tested the resulting dual arch images at all [yet]. I count on the community. @ Aaron: total size of all images is 1.8GB, nicely (way) below the 2.5GB treshold we had set for "serve them all or not". You can find the added dual images and updated Changelog @ http://build.archlinux.org/isos/ I used the "full" profile, so these things are stripped: ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/boot ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/include ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/src ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/share ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/lib/modules not sure if this is a good thing, if space permits I want to keep the docs, and the /usr/include and /usr/src seems also useful for those cases where you need to compile something. Dieter.