On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 21:20, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:57:40 +0200 Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 19:50, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Montag 26 Januar 2009 18:28:29 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
I'm fairly certain we agreed, internally, to use ArchLinux wherever possible. Adding Thayer for confirmation here.
And I am quite sure we use "Arch Linux" everywhere. Just have a look at our homepage, wikipedia article or distrowatch. So just to be consistent we should keep "Arch Linux".
during one of these Arch Linux vs ArchLinux discussions someone posted a link to one of the first Judd's announcements, but I cannot find it now. plus most distros have Linux as a separate word, e.g. Debian GNU/Linux, Red Hat Linux (at least it was so before that Enterprise/Fedora split) etc. sorry for bikeshedding offtopic. :-)
I also think Arch Linux is notably cooler then ArchLinux. But Judd is *the man*, if he wanted it ArchLinux then so be it.. maybe someone can ask him? :-)
no, actually it was with space that's just the logo text that had arch and linux concatenated and lowerspace
P.S.: either I suck at writing search queries in gmail, or gmail's search suck, I cannot find link to that email.
Why look at email when you can look at the old website? http://web.archive.org/web/20020328043401/http://www.archlinux.org/ Note the title and the usages in the text. -Dan