Am 25.01.2011 23:11, schrieb C Anthony Risinger:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
I wondered whether we are going to use xz for squashfs compression in the upcoming kernel 2.6.38? apologies... i swear there was a thread recently with answers to these...
) how much MB or % (approx?) does this free up? Not as much as we'd like I think.
) will this increase the minimum RAM needed for inflation? I don't think so, no.
) what other goodies/considerations come with this change? Hm, none?
From my tests it makes booting faster (albeit only a minor change)
On 25.01.2011 23:45, Thomas Bächler wrote: probably because less MBs of data need to be read from the rather slow CD/DVD medium. So this sounds like there's only a few minor positive changes without any drawbacks? I'd say go for it then. :)