6 Feb
2010
6 Feb
'10
2:21 a.m.
On 02/05/2010 06:01 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:50:17 -0300 > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi<vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > > >> Hello >> >> I am writing a kind of draft of things that I think that should be >> kept in mind for the next release: >> >> * Release archiso (2010.02) with the current [core], the previous >> intent was for 2009.12. (I guess this will be the last release with >> mkinitcpio based on klibc) >> * Merge the all pending changes to archiso from Svenstaro [#1] >> * Merge the all pending changes to archiso from me [#2] >> * Make an updated aif package with latest fixes. >> * Make all four hybrid ISO images core-{i686,x86_64} and >> net-{i686,x86_64} (images for testing) >> * Update the very very old "archiso" package in extra at this point. >> * ISOs should be uploaded after KDE SC 4.4 hits extra to avoid mirror >> issues. >> * Any other things? Please add it. >> * Update the archiso wiki for new scheme. >> I recently builded an "archiso-2010.02" on i686 without any issues, >> boot fine on KVM in both modes (as disk and as cdrom). >> When all this is done, a branch ""kill-klibc"" can be created in >> archiso, for working with new mkinitcpio 0.6. (I made some testings >> here, with a trivial patch [#3] [#4]). >> Also a dual-arch ISO can be started for next archiso release. >> >> >> All comments are welcomed. Good luck! >> >> >> >> [#1] http://github.com/Svenstaro/archiso-lglive >> [#2] http://github.com/djgera/archiso/tree/djgera >> [#3] >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/2010-February/000797.html >> [#4] http://github.com/djgera/archiso/tree/experimental >> >> > Thanks for following up. > note that the new images will be isolinux based. not grub. > i don't have much spare time anymore lately so i've been slacking on > this stuff. luckily a new release should now be much less work then it > was before. > I would like to switch to a more iterative scheme where we continuously > build new "testing" isos (ie a weekly or daily crontab) and recommend > users to try them out. and every once in a while, we could support a > specific version of the iso. > Ok > Gerhard and I have already setup a build environment on sigurd, so all > i need to do -i think- is update the chroot and install the latest > archiso from git. or should i wait a bit for all patches being > integrated in archiso git? and get the iso's publicly available. (we > discussed this a few times (mirrors et al) but i forgot the outcome) > note: i'm not interested in investing my time in archiso internals, i > know how to use it to build isos but for making it work I rely on > patches from you guys (actually on Aaron, as only he can merge them in > afaik). > Yes pending patches should be applied, otherwise won't work. (Adding CC to Aaron) > and i need to merge in some patches for aif (such as those from thomas, > but others also) and do a new aif release. > OK > once new iso's are built i expect the community to (also) test them. > Gerhard and I have done a huge amount of test installations the > previous times and I don't want to go through that again. > I think at least archiso issues are covered, this is was tested during this time. Since switched to a new scheme (syslinux-hybrid) more feedback will come for people. About AIF, I didn't any type of test. > Dieter > > Thanks for the feedback ;) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D