On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:33:20AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.03.2013 00:32, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi:
On 03/12/2013 03:24 PM, Hans Spath wrote:
Hello,
according to https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archiso/ archiso is licensed under "GPL".
Is that correct? What version? v1? v2? v2 or any later? v3?
Regards, Hans Spath
Hi
I guess is GPL2.
@Arch-Releng: right?
I think nobody ever cared about licensing. As it is, the archiso tree contains no license statement. I'd just use "GPL2 or later", but I don't know what the implications are. Or, as the number of authors is small, just ask everyone to relicense as WTFPL?
I would suggest using a license which has a legal history, instead of one of a one-off written by someone who likely isn't a lawyer, and whose license hasn't been vetted by one.