On 04/06/2010 08:22 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:14:14 +0200 Dieter Plaetinck<dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:12:02 +0200 Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
Wait, weren't these going to be dual-arch images?
i will do dual-arch images yes. haven't had time yet. This shouldn't hold anyone back from testing the normal images though.
Dieter
okay guys, I ran Gerardo's archiso2dual script and wow. it seems to work nicely. Note that I have not tested the resulting dual arch images at all [yet]. I count on the community.
@ Aaron: total size of all images is 1.8GB, nicely (way) below the 2.5GB treshold we had set for "serve them all or not".
You can find the added dual images and updated Changelog @ http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
I used the "full" profile, so these things are stripped: ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/boot ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/include ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/src ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/usr/share ${work_dir}/tmp/${_arch}/root-image/lib/modules
not sure if this is a good thing, if space permits I want to keep the docs, and the /usr/include and /usr/src seems also useful for those cases where you need to compile something.
Dieter.
You can just use -T split_lm that does not remove any file, it just split /usr/share and /lib/modules. Images sizes are aceptable (if I remember good, core-dual still under 650MB). -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D