2009/2/4 Thayer Williams <thayerw@gmail.com>:
This is why I'm not fond of codenames.
+1 for not having codenames at all... very difficult to understand which is more 'proper'. It'd also be more practical to use versioning for the ISOs which is not dependent on anything else at all; for example the current method uses dates which means if the ISO is not made within the month, the version has to be changed. If we use kernel versions, it is much better; however there's still the small (though unlikely) chance that a particular kernel cannot be released with an ISO due to some showstopper bug. So the older method of versioning (0.8, 0.9 ...) was better in that sense, since it was not tied to any specific component (spatial, temporal or package). -- Abhishek