24 Aug
2018
24 Aug
'18
8:34 p.m.
El 23/08/18 a las 06:20, Christian Hesse escribió:
> Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de> on Wed, 2018/08/22 11:24:
>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi via arch-releng <arch-releng@archlinux.org> on Sat,
>> 2018/08/18 23:29:
>>> +# Prepare amd_ucode
>>> +make_amd_ucode_img() {
>>> + mkdir -p ${work_dir}/amd-ucode/kernel/x86/microcode
>>> + cat
>>> ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd*.bin >
>>> ${work_dir}/amd-ucode/kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
>>> + pushd ${work_dir}/amd-ucode > /dev/null
>>> + echo kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin | bsdcpio -o -H newc -R
>>> 0:0
>>>> amd-ucode.img
>>> + popd > /dev/null
>>> + cp ${work_dir}/amd-ucode/amd-ucode.img
>>> ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/boot/amd-ucode.img +}
>>
>> Wondering if we should put this into a package... Could be a split package
>> of linux-firmware. Any opinion on this?
>
> [ Added Laurent to CC as he maintains the linux-firmware package. ]
>
> I've attached a proposal patch to add a split package amd-ucode-early to
> linux-firmware. Any objections? Is the name ok or do we prefer just
> 'amd-ucode'?
amd-ucode is right (like intel-ucode)
missing LICENSE file [#1]
>
> And another note... Did anybody test if microcode is updated properly if both,
> intel-ucode.img and amd-ucode, are loaded?
>
At least one feedback from intel user [#2], fw is loaded fine.
Thanks.
[#1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59796
[#2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59694#comment172278