On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:

Yes!, No other relevant problem for GRUB here. But maybe, a good choice,
is that the final ISO (x86_64) include a patched grub-gfx (-11 revision)
for rescue and other purposes.

--

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

That would be fair, although that parameter is the only thing needed for it to install and boot correctly the updated grub-gfx should be in (and it is likely to be in as the images have to be rebuild).

What keeps me thinking about is... until now grub-gfx was always installed instead of grub? If... grub-gfx packages were both updated at the time of building the images this bug would possibly be hidden and never found.

P.S.: It seems it will be a 2009.02 in the end... :(

--
Alexander