aif handles this probably the same as /arch/setup. package installation stuff is an aspect that has remained pretty much untouched. But it's on my/the todo list :-)Am Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:58:02 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Gerhard Brauer <gerbra@archlinux.de> wrote:Am Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:53:05 -0600 schrieb Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Hugo Doria <hugodoria@gmail.com> wrote:* There's only two categories on "Select Packages". Base and base-devel. And there are some packages with categorie "None";This is new. I'll look into itThis are the default groups since 2006.08. You could/should only install packages from base (and base-devel) and a few other packages during first time installation. Pre-2008.06 has groups like default or "other libs", but these aren't needed.I'm just wondering where the "None" packages come from.The current installer download only core.db.tat.gz. So each package we offer in the installer that don't belongs to a package in core will get a "None" as repo source. We should investigate this (ex. how aif handle this).
But i think it's OK, cause we advise the user at this point: install only the base/core system (and your absolutely needed additional packages: wlan stuff etc). But never heard that this "None" status irritates any user... BTW: Aaron, have you modified the archiso/package.lst for this Alpha ISOs (20-Jan-2009 17:53)? I miss dmraid, which we want include. Gerhard